Conservatives try to understand progressive
liberal positions. To conservatives, liberal positions are hypocritically, sometimes immoral
or just plain foolish. Here are some questions that
conservatives have about liberal contradictory positions.
How can liberals claim to be supporters of labor and unions when they support
environmental restrictions that limit development and eliminate jobs?
How can liberals claim to support the expansion of the economy when
they favor government regulations that limit entrepreneurship and when
they tax profitable investments?
How can liberals claim to help citizens achieve the American dream
when they punish financial success through the progressive income tax and laws that target certain groups?
How can liberals claim to be helping people in need when they support
social welfare programs that make people dependent on the government
and keep people in poverty?
How can liberals claim to be for equality of opportunity for all, when they
promote racial, ethnic, and sexual favoritism by supporting affirmative
action that only helps certain people?
How can liberals claim to favor the rights of children and families, yet
they sanction the murder of children by supporting the practice of
abortion through planned parenthood?
These are a few questions to think about when deciding who you want to vote for.
The Yuri Factor
Four Stages of Mind Control by Patricia Aiken
One of the privileges of working at The Idaho Observer office is
answering calls from subscribers. No matter how brief or long the
conversation, the topic seems to invariably lead to the frustration of
sharing truth. “Why can’t they see this? I showed them the paper, DVD,
photos, websites”…fill in the blank. It’s safe to say we’ve all
experienced this more often than we care to. When I stumbled upon
videos of a KGB defector from lectures in the 1980’s, I finally
understood. In fact, a colleague and I have a code word for this
experience that doesn’t alleviate the frustration but does shorten the
discussion. “Yuri.” That’s all we say now. So if you happen to call
the office and we get to that point in the conversation, feel free to
just say “Yuri”.
In 1984 G. Edward Griffin interviewed Yuri Alexandrovic Bezmenov. Born
in 1939 in suburban Moscow, the son of a high ranking Soviet Army
officer, he was educated in elite schools inside the Soviet Union.
Bezmenov developed an expertise in Indian culture and languages. He
went on to a career as a “journalist” for Novosti, which was and still
is the press agency of Russia. It’s also a front for the KGB. After
becoming totally disgusted with the Soviet system and at great risk to
his life, Bezmenov defected to the West in 1970. He escaped disguised as
one of the many hippies that had flocked to India for enlightenment.
Ardently Pro-American, he began writing and lecturing on the subject of
propaganda, disinformation, and ideological subversion.
Bezmenov explained that psychological warfare has little to do with
James Bond style spies. Hollywood’s fascination with espionage films is
romanticized to sell more advertising. “But in reality the main
emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all.” He
estimated only 15 percent of time, money and manpower is spent on
Bond-type espionage, the other 85 percent is the slow process of
ideological subversion or psychological warfare. The goal is to change
the perception of reality of every American that “despite the abundance
of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusion in the
interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and
their country.” This tremendous brainwashing process goes very slowly
and is divided into four basic stages. America is clearly in the last
stages.
Stage One- Demoralization
It takes 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation [i.e. corrupt morally].
This is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation
of students by exposing them to enemy ideology. “In other words,
Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at
least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or
counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American
patriotism.” The KGB’s activity was directed towards compiling huge
amounts of information on individuals instrumental in creating public
opinion. They included publishers, editors, journalists, actors,
educators, political science professors, politicians and leaders in
business.
These individuals are divided into roughly two groups- those who would
tow the Soviet foreign policy and those who would refuse. Those that go
along are promoted to positions of power through media and public
manipulation. Character or physical assassination awaits those that
refuse. Even the pro-Marxist, when he has outlived his usefulness, is
targeted for death or imprisonment. Bezmenov gives a handy tour of the
Marxist foreign policy hit list- Nicaragua, Grenada, Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, Cuba and Vietnam. “Idealistic, leftist communists are the
useful idiots; the leftists who are idealistically believing in the
beauty of Soviet or Communist or Socialist or whatever system; when they
get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies.” His KGB
instructors specifically made the point, “never bother with leftists,
forget about these political prostitutes - aim higher”. Large
circulation, established conservative media, rich movie makers,
intellectuals in academic circles are the goal. Cynical, ego-centric
people, suffering from self-importance, who lack morals, are the most
desirable recruits. In other words, the sociopath.
The first stage of psychological warfare has long been complete.
Bezmenov pointed out that “America is stuck, even if you start right now
this minute; you start educating [the] new generation of Americans - it
will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of ideological
perception of reality, back to normalcy and patriotism.
“The result? The result you can see -- most of the people who graduated
in the 60’s, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the
positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass
media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can’t get
rid of to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and
react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their
mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove
that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the
basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words [for] these
people the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To
rid society of these people you need another 15 or 20 years to educate a
new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who
would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States society.”
The good news, if there is any, is the psychological shock when the
idealists see “what the beautiful society of equality and social justice
means in practice, obviously they will revolt. They will be very
unhappy, frustrated people, and Marxist Leninist regime does not
tolerate these people. Obviously they will join the [ranks] of
dissenters; dissidents. Unlike the present [1984] United States there
will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America.
“The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed
already for the last 25 years [50 years]. Actually, it’s over fulfilled
because demoralization now reaches such areas where not even Comrade
Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such tremendous
success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of
moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information
does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to
assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower
him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and
pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him
the concentration camps...he will refuse to believe it.... until he is
going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When the military boot
crashes - then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the
tragedy of the situation of demoralization.”
Stage Two- Destabilization
“At this stage, [the] subverter does not care about your ideas and the
patterns of your consumption. Whether you eat junk food and get fat and
flabby doesn’t matter anymore.
“It only takes 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation. This time what
matters is essentials; economy, foreign relations, [and] defense
systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some... sensitive
areas such as defense and [the] economy, the influence of
Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I
could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the
world that the process will go that fast.”
Stage Three- Crisis.
This is where we are today. “It takes only up to 6 weeks to bring a
country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now
[1984]; and after crisis, with the violent change of power structure and
economy.”
Stage Four- Normalization
“After the crisis, following the violent change of regime, structure
and economy, comes what is called the phase of normalization, which can
last indefinitely. Normalization is an expression of great cynicism,
after the Soviet propaganda. When the tanks invaded Czechoslovakia in
1968, Brezhnev said: Now the situation is normalized in Czechoslovakia.”
Normalization includes promises of “all kinds of goodies, and paradise
on Earth. To destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of
free market competition; and to put a big brother government in
Washington D.C.; with benevolent dictators like [1984] Walter Mondale
[2008 Obama] who will promise lots of things. Never mind whether the
promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms
of a new generation of Soviet Assassins. He will create false
illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is NOT under
control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American
politicians, media, and educational system train another generation of
people who think they are living at the peacetime. False. United States
is in a state of war; undeclared, total war against the basic principles
and foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not
Comrade Andropov of course - it’s the system. However, ridiculous it may
sound, [it is] the world Communist system, or the world Communist
conspiracy. …Unlike me, you have literally several years to live on
unless United States wake up. The time bomb is ticking. With every
second the disaster is coming closer. Unlike me, you will have nowhere
to defect to, unless you want to live in Antarctica with penguins. This
is it; this is the last country with freedom and possibility.” In 1984,
Bezmenov felt America needed a large national effort to educate people
in the patriotic sense of values with an explanation of the real danger
of a socialist, communist, Big Brother state welfare system. His words
were indeed prophetic. “If people fail to grasp the imminence of this
danger and this development, nothing will help the United States. You
can say goodbye to your freedoms. All your freedoms disappear; they
will be charred in a few seconds- and with your precious lives.” His
last admonition was to force the government- “and I do not mean send
letters, petitions, or other noble and beautiful work of this kind- I’m
talking about forcing the government to stop aiding communism.”
It’s Friday! You know what that means? It’s Everybody Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day!
You might want to poke around Lee’s site to see what else he has to
say about Kimberlin. It’s a lot. We’re really lucky to have a big name
like him investigating Kimberlin’s past. Lee also notes Kimberlin is a dangerous guy; let us never forget that.
Also, Smitty over at The Other McCain has an important post about why this event matters. It’s about freedom of speech, people!
So my effort is to give you a brief timeline of events during the
investigation into the Speedway bombing, with some explanation. I’ve
taken this info from four basic articles, which you can find here, here, here, and here
. I’m offering this information only as reporters did at the time of
the trial and later, so that you understand what leads the police were
following.
1978: Brett Kimberlin owns a health food store/vegetarian restaurant
in Broad Ripple. Police believe the store may be a front for drug
trafficking and have Kimberlin in their sights.
July 29, 1978: Julia Scyphers is murdered. She answered a knock at
her front door; a man inquired about some items she had available at a
recent yard sale. Julia led him out to the garage. She was shot once
in the back of the head. Her husband caught a glimpse of the man at the
door and saw the getaway car speed away from their home. At first,
investigators are stymied as to why Scyphers was murdered, as she seemed
to have no enemies, save one: Brett Kimberlin, her daughter Sandra’s
employer and boyfriend. Kimberlin seemed to have a less than wholesome
interest in one of Julia’s granddaughters.
Sept 1- 6, 1978: Eight bomb blasts ring through Speedway, Indiana
The final blast injures Carl DeLong and his wife. The police suspect
that the bombings were intended to distract the police from the
Scyphers’ murder case; however, between 50 and 100 ATF agents descend on
Indianapolis to assist local police with the investigation.
Sept 20, 1978: Kimberlin is picked up by Army investigators when a
print shop owner alerts them about a suspicious customer. Kimberlin is
wearing a security guard’s uniform with DoD insignia and asking for
copies of military drivers’ licenses and other materials to be made.
When officers arrive, he attempts to hide the incriminating evidence by
eating it. As a result of this, investigators decide to hold him
overnight.
Sept 21, 1978: With search warrants in hand, investigators search
Kimberlin’s 1970 Impala, which he drove to the print shop the day
before; they find bomb-making materials, including timers which match
those found at the scene of the Speedway bombings. At the same time,
another team of investigators searches a Jackson County property owned
by the Kimberlin family. There they find a buried steel tank containing
1000 lbs of marijuana, along with Tovex used to blast the rock to
install the underground tank. This Tovex will later link Kimberlin to
other incidents.
Nov 17, 1978: Investigators interview Sandra Barton (Julia Scyhphers’
daughter and employee/girlfriend of Kimberlin). That same night, at a
nearby Burger Chef restaurant, four employees are kidnapped and
murdered. Their bodies are found two days later, two shot execution
style, one stabbed to death so viciously the blade broke off inside the
body, and one died from blunt force trauma to the head. No known motive
exists, nor were the suspects ever found. There were rumors one of the
employees may have been involved in a drug deal. Investigators
suspected this might have been the work of Kimberlin and his associates,
but they were never charged. The murders remain unsolved to this day.
In an attempt to build a case against him, Kimberlin is still free.
Feb 8, 1979: Local authorities receive a tip from Texas border agents
about a group of suspects they’ve rounded up. Among them are Brett
Kimberlin and his pilot, Robert Scott Bixler. The group is released but
placed under surveillance.
Feb 16, 1979: Kimberlin and his associates are at a secret airstrip
they’ve carved out in the Texas desert, awaiting a shipment of Columbian
marijuana. They are being watched by local and federal agents. The
plane is unable to land, due to heavy fog, and dumps its million dollar
cargo over a 125 mile area. Texas agents recover the bales of pot,
while Kimberlin and his gang are arrested. Kimberlin will later claim
he was simply riding around out in the desert when cops picked him up
for no reason.
Armed with photos of the drug crew, investigators show the images to
Fred Scyphers, who recognizes William “Bill” Bowman as the man who came
to his front door on July 29, 1978, luring his wife to her death.
Kimberlin and Bowman are still free, after being charged for the Texas “pot bombing” incident.
Feb 27, 1979: Based on Fred Scyphers’ identification of him, Bowman
is arrested for the murder of Julia Scyphers. Investigators hope that
Bowman will admit that Kimberlin was behind the hit on Scyphers.
Feb 28, 1979: A federal grand jury indicts Kimberlin in the Speedway bombing case.
Mar 11, 1979: Sandra Barton’s sister, Patricia — who lives in Texas —
contacts authorities to report she found a sack hidden in her
backyard. The contents of the bag — blasting caps, blue-and-white Mark
Time timers, an AR-15 rifle and 14 plastic-covered sausages of Tovex 200
with factory markings — further connect Kimberlin to the Speedway
bombings and the Tovex used to blast away rock for the buried steel tank
at the Jackson county property. Informants state they saw Kimberlin
plant the bag, in an attempt to frame Patricia and her husband for the
Speedway bombings. (Sandra Barton’s daughters were now living with
Patricia.)
Mar 14, 1979: Fred Scyphers dies of cancer. With his death, the case against Bowman in the Scyphers murder collapses.
Nov, 1979: Kimberlin enters a guilty plea for charges related to the Texas marijuana smuggling case and is sentenced to 4 years.
Sept, 1980: Kimberlin is tried for the Speedway bombing incident. A
federal jury is unable to reach a decision on the bombing, but does
convict him for impersonating a federal officer. He receives a 12-year
sentence.
October 15, 1981: Kimberlin is found guilty of the Speedway bombings and receives a 50-year sentence.
February 23, 1983: Carl DeLong, victim of the final Speedway blast,
commits suicide. He was in constant pain as a result of his injuries.
Later that year, DeLong’s wife, Sandra, won a $1.6 million settlement
from Kimberlin, which she never collected.
October/November 1988: Kimberlin launches himself into the national
spotlight by claiming a week before the elections that Vice Presidential
candidate Dan Quayle purchased marijuana from him on a regular basis,
back in the early 1970s. This story gets picked up by Nina Totenburg
and many media outlets — television networks, newspapers, and news
magazines — all of whom seek interviews. The prison first insists that
there should be a press conference where all reporters may ask their
questions, rather than separate interviews, but the press conference
never takes place.
This is the basis for the “political prisoner” charge Kimberlin would
later make, as well as the reason he became a romantic hero among the
movers and shakers of the left, who feel the 1988 election was “stolen”
because of this incident.
In 1991 and ’92, in order for the election not to be “stolen” again,
various leftists begin flogging the Kimberlin/Quayle drug story, among
them Gary Trudeau.
In 1994, Kimberlin is paroled, after serving about 13 years of his
50-year sentence. Because he made no effort to pay the DeLong judgment,
his parole was revoked in 1997 and he went back to prison for about four
more years He was finally released in 2001.
This last bit is just me asking some questions, based on the timeline
I’ve laid out. It’s purely speculation, and is offered as such, not as
demonstrable fact.
1994… I wonder who was President at that time? And wasn’t there a
drug trafficking story in Clinton’s background, as well? Makes you
wonder, doesn’t it? Could Kimberlin’s early release have been a “thank
you” for helping Clinton win the election?
I don’t know, I’m just asking questions here.
This article may be freely reposted all or in part. Because
we want the word spread far and wide about the kind of person Brett
Kimberlin is.
Are you aware what these
“recall” elections are really about? What are this November's
national elections all about? It is not about choosing between Democrats or
Republicans. These elections are a choice between a big government
(Socialism or Communism) or a limited small government
(Constitutional Republic). If you are not sure what this means to
you here are a few quick examples to get you thinking.
Think: Do you either want
a government run health care system where you will rely on the
government to pick what is right for you and what tests your doctor
should run, or, you choosing what is right and you talking with your
doctor to determine the tests you might need for the best course of
action?
Decide: Do you want the
big unions, backed by the government, deciding state policies and rules or do we the people choosing
the individuals we hire for government jobs and set the rules. Do we allow the unions
to “protect” their people regardless of what they do on the job
or allowing people to be fired for doing things that are
obviously wrong.
Choose: Do you allow the
government to decide what is the right type of speech or do you want
truly free speech where people can say stupid things (which in turn
tells you all about them). When speech is censored it does not allow
us to see the real individual. Allowing people to speak their mind
tells us what we need to know about them.
Consider: Do you want
government-run businesses where they never fail and get “bailed
out” or a free market where if you run a business poorly it goes
out of business and someone else is allowed to take their place if
that business is truly needed. This goes along with the government
choosing solar and wind companies that fail because it is based on
something people do not want and is not sustainable or do you
allow the free market to explore other alternatives like natural gas
or hydrogen because they might work better.
There are many more
examples, but ultimately, you need to decide what you really want our
country to be. Do you always want others to decide your future or
are you in control of your life? Do you want to rely on a big
lumbering government to always be there for you or allow local people
to help one another and to choose what is right for their community?
Do you want the government to run just one approved church or allow
people to have choices on which religion they practice (this is why
our forefathers left Europe originally).
May
I suggest you read the book “The 5000 Year Leap” or, if you have
time, read “Atlas Shrugged.” Your local library has these
books. They will help you decide what you want your choices to be
about, because choosing between these types of government will affect
your life and the lives of your children. Please feel free to call
me if you want to discuss this further, or if you would like to meet.
I am in the phone book.
I close with a quote from
Ayn Rand: “Government "help" to business is just as
disastrous as government persecution...the only way a government can
be of service to national prosperity is by keeping its hands off.”
Obama Inserts Himself Into Other Presidents’ Bios:
• On Feb. 22, 1924 Calvin Coolidge became the first president to make a public radio address to the American people. President Coolidge later helped create the Federal Radio Commission, which has now evolved to become the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). President Obama became the first president to hold virtual gatherings and town halls using Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, etc.
• In a 1946 letter to the National Urban League, President Truman wrote that the government has “an obligation to see that the civil rights of every citizen are fully and equally protected.” He ended racial segregation in civil service and the armed forces in 1948. Today the Obama administration continues to strive toward upholding the civil rights of its citizens, repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, allowing people of all sexual orientations to serve openly in our armed forces.
• President Lyndon Johnson signed Medicare signed (sic) into law in 1965 — providing millions of elderly healthcare stability. President Obama’s historic health care reform law, the Affordable Care Act, strengthens Medicare, offers eligible seniors a range of preventive services with no cost-sharing, and provides discounts on drugs when in the coverage gap known as the “donut hole.”
• On August 14, 1935, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act. Today the Obama administration continues to protect seniors and ensure Social Security will be there for future generations.
• In a June 28, 1985 speech Reagan called for a fairer tax code, one where a multi-millionaire did not have a lower tax rate than his secretary. Today, President Obama is calling for the same with the Buffett Rule.
Amazingly that the four Dem candidates combined for 646,076 votes while Walker pulled 613,597 votes. The strong showing for Walker, when he really did not need people to show up, is a great sign for keeping him in office and showing the country that the recall was really a sham put on by a minority of voters.
Let us all help you candidates and make sure you vote on June 5th.
Collective Bargaining Repeal: The Best Thing That Ever Happened to Wisconsin Schools
The repeal of much of Wisconsin’s
collective bargaining law with regard to many of Wisconsin’s public
employees has not been adequately explained. This repeal will do more to
improve the quality and lower the cost of Wisconsin government than
anything else we’ve done. There are approximately 275,000 government
employees in the state of Wisconsin. About 72,000 work for the state,
38,000 for cities and villages, 48,000 for counties, 10,500 (full time
equivalent) for technical colleges, and 105,229 for schools.Only half of state employees are unionized, but almost all school employees are.
As you can see, the biggest impact
will be on Wisconsin’s schools. Since my office has received the most
complaints from school teachers, let’s look at how collective bargaining
affects both the cost and quality of our schools.
Under current law, virtually all
conditions of employment have to be spelled out in a collectively
bargained agreement. Consequently, it is very difficult to remove
underperforming school teachers. It may take years of documentation and
thousands of dollars in attorney fees to fire a bad teacher. Is it right
that two or three classes of second graders must endure a bad teacher
while waiting for documentation to be collected? Just as damaging is the
inability to motivate or change the mediocre teacher who isn’t bad
enough to fire. Good superintendants are stymied when they try to
improve a teacher who is doing just enough to get by.
While most teachers care about their
students, some only “teach to the contract.” An elementary school
teacher’s contract may require just seven hours and forty-five minutes a
day in school. If the principal wants to have a meeting after school to
discuss curriculum, or requests a meeting with parents of a troubled
student, a teacher could say that this is not in the contract. Recall
the recent flare-up when Fond du Lac teachers objected to having to work
eight hour days.
Another problem affecting our
schools’ quality is that payment for individual teachers is not based on
merit but on a union negotiated pay schedule. A mediocre teacher with a
master’s degree and additional college credits gets more money than a
superior teacher who doesn’t have as many college credits. This is
clearly unfair, and destroys healthy incentives that would encourage
teachers to be more effective.
If enrollment drops, teachers must
be let go. In practice, this means that collective bargaining causes the
better teachers with less seniority to be laid off. If that’s not bad
enough, a teacher who has never taught third grade may get to move ahead
of a good third grade teacher because of union bumping rights. You also
have to ask the union for permission to “share” a teacher with another
school district if you want to give students more options. If you want
to borrow another district’s teacher for a day to offer Mandarin
Chinese, you must ask the union to sign off. The same could be true of
offering new electives online for particularly gifted and talented
students.
It has been well reported that, under
collective bargaining, districts have been stuck with the teacher union
insurance company which can cost $3,000 or more per teacher than a plan that is virtually identical
to that which another company is willing to provide. Switching to
Health Savings Accounts like the private sector is out of the question.
The teachers union must agree to changes in the schedule.If
a school district wants to set their schedule so that it is the same as
private schools to save money on school bussing, the union must sign
off.
A teacher may be entitled to 13 paid
personal days. All this for employees who may only be required to work
190 days a year in the first place. There is also the cost of time spent
negotiating seventy page contracts.
Clearly, collective bargaining
penalizes schools and students, costs an exorbitant amount of money, and
lowers the quality of education in Wisconsin. The same story could be
told for tech schools, cities, counties, and the state. Tech schools may
have to pay the same amount for teachers in very different fields. If
such a school needs to offer a good salary to attract talented teachers
for dental hygiene or tool and die, that’s understandable. Must
Milwaukee Area Technical College, however, pay well over $100,000 to
teach someone how to pass their GED? The compensatory problems that are a
problem in our K-12 system hurt our tech schools, in my opinion, even
more.
Counties or cities may want more
flexibility to transfer employees between departments. Why should a
local government not be able to switch people from roads to parks?
Racine County was sued by the union for using jail inmates to do
landscape work on medians. Volunteers have been unable to help out
because of union contracts.
The removal of collective bargaining
in prisons will also save money. Under collective bargaining, guards
could call in sick on first shift and work overtime on second shift.
Similar to counties, you could not shuttle people back and forth between
job descriptions. If a prisoner must go to the hospital, the prison may
have to send a transporter who is on overtime to take the prisoner to
the hospital rather than an extra prison guard who is not in the prison
at that time.
Franklin Roosevelt originally said
that unions and government do not mix. After reviewing some union
contracts, I can see why. Jimmy Carter, a Democrat backed by a
Democratic Congress, greatly reduced collective bargaining for federal
employees via the Civil Service Reform Act. Even President Obama has not
tried to restore these rights. Massachusetts Democrats recently passed a bill divesting government employees of the power to collectively bargain most health-care benefits.
While we did not eliminate collective bargaining, we certainly reduced its scope in Wisconsin. As a direct result, the cost savings are significant at all levels of government.
(Cost savings to schools from having school employees pay a small part
of their health insurance and pension costs more than offset the mild
reduction in education funding.) But, the most important benefit will be
an improvement in the quality of our schools as efficiency, personnel
decisions, compensation decisions and methods of teaching children will
not be subject to union meddling and obstruction.
Please look at these amazing pictures of the old Communist East Germany and what it now looks like under the Capitalism of Germany. The images are an amazing transformation and shows how much better Capitalism is for society.
We are a non-profit, non-partisan group of united citizens of Wisconsin who are involved in our local communities. We attend school board meetings, city council meetings and county meetings to let our voices be heard. We hold elected officials accountable for their votes and views.
We also support candidates that have constitutional values and support state rights. This support means campaigning, volunteering time and energy to help them get elected.
